The statement admitted that, over the last nine months of 2016, the company had lost $260m. Following this announcement, Nikon’s share price plummeted 15 percent and loyal customers were sent into a panic. Photographers tend to invest a lot of money in a camera system, purchasing multiple lenses and camera bodies designed to work together. For the millions invested in the Nikon system, the announcement exacerbated existing fears about the decline of the digital camera industry and it’s key players.
Promuser’s Global Digital Camera Report for January 2017 confirmed total digital camera production is dropping steadily, and is currently less than half the most recent high-point: the 45 million units produced in October 2014. The number of units shipped is also falling: it was down 1.6 percent year-on-year in January, with no signs of improvement for the rest of the year.
This decline is curious, at least in the way it has played out. Aside from Nikon, few if any leading manufacturers have acknowledged there is any problem. The former cancelled its planned DL series of mirrorless (high-end compact) cameras in the wake of the loss announcement, but market leader Canon released its newest professional model (the EOS 5D Mk IV) in September last year. The camera was universally recognised as an excellent, capable piece of technology, but a unifying feature of reviews was the suggestion Canon had not changed enough from the previous model (the Mk III) to justify the upgrade.
Camera reviewer Ken Rockwell said of the new release: “I’m so impressed that Canon chose to introduce this 5D Mk IV. Canon didn’t need to; it already has [most features] covered in the 5D Mk III. The 5D series sells very few cameras compared to Canon’s [consumer level] DSLRs, so we ought to be glad that Canon actively develops new models that don’t do much for profits (and eat into sales of other Canon cameras), but give us all more camera choices.”
The response perfectly encapsulates one of the market’s main problems: a lack of innovation. Unlike in other stagnating areas of technology – such as laptops and televisions – no complete alternative has yet superseded digital cameras. They are still widely used and appreciated, especially at a professional level where tiny smartphone cameras cannot compete, but the incentive to regularly upgrade is being eroded.
Metrics that once drove camera upgrades, such as megapixel counts and sensor sizes, are being widely called into question. Canon users, for example, spent many years clamouring for greater megapixel counts, culminating in 2015’s EOS 5DS and 5DSR models with staggering 50.6 megapixel sensors. Around the same time, Fujifilm set about releasing a range of attractive, functional cameras with much more humble 16 megapixel sensors (now increased to 24 megapixels), but still marketed at professionals. The range was a critical and financial success, proving that ergonomics and build quality matter more than abstruse technical specifications.
“I think people looking for billboard-size prints may be attracted by larger sizes”, said professional documentary photographer Kevin Mullins. “I find the Fujifilm size to be fine though; I’ve had images from these cameras printed at three metres wide, and I find the size of the cameras liberating.”
The fact is most high-end digital cameras are exactly the same as one another, and the same as older models from the last five years
The rise of Fujifilm as a serious competitor to Canon and Nikon, alongside other mirrorless manufacturers such as Sony and Olympus, has spread customers much more thinly than before. Manufacturers need significant innovation in order to stand out, and yet innovation is exactly what the industry is currently lacking. Canon makes its own digital sensors, but the majority of other major manufacturers (including Nikon and Fujifilm) actually use Sony sensors, making the market surprisingly uniform. “I’m not a camera engineer, but I think there may be some head-scratching going on in the labs regarding which direction to take technology”, noted Mullins.
It’s often obscured by superficial features, but the fact is most high-end digital cameras are exactly the same as one another, and the same as older models from the last five years. What’s more, there’s little prospect of them changing much in the near future. As a result, there’s little incentive to upgrade as often as manufacturers would like, which is behind sluggish sales and rapidly stagnating production levels.
“If you’re in the market to buy a new camera and don’t have one already…you’ll struggle to make a bad decision”, wrote tech journalist Vlad Savov for The Verge last year. “But if you already own a camera from the past half decade, you probably won’t feel any urge or need to upgrade. Digital imaging technology has matured [and] maturity brings with it a sort of developmental stagnation.”
Tangible and true
The problem manufacturers face now is how to move on from direct innovation. Launching new models with obscure specification tweaks is barely keeping leading brands afloat – a radical rethink is required. Fujifilm, continuing the imaginative streak that saw the company rival the dominance of Canon and Nikon, may have found the answer.
From vinyl records to Hollywood films on celluloid, analogue media has made an astonishing comeback. Photography, not so long ago, was also an entirely analogue process, and film photography is now being embraced in a big way by consumers looking for something new. Indeed, it may sound strange to describe film as ‘new’, but a 2015 survey by UK manufacturer Ilford Photo found that 30 percent of film users were under 35 years old, and 60 percent had only started using the medium in the last five years. This burgeoning trend has not been lost on Fujifilm, and the company has started to put significant weight behind its Instax range of instant film cameras. Though launched in 1998, sales have only recently taken off: in 2004 only 100,000 Instax units were sold, whereas 2015/16 saw the figure skyrocket to five million.
“In an age where we are caught in a maelstrom of digital images, with hundreds of slightly different takes and edited shots across social media, the simple joy of a physical, printed photo is really appealing”, said Chris Chater, Fujifilm’s Instax Business Manager for the UK and Europe. “There’s an increasing appetite for analogue media – people will always yearn to have something physical.”
Instax cameras are firmly marketed at a young demographic, with bright plastic bodies and fashionable limited editions in collaboration with the likes of Michael Kors. This strategy, a world away from the fusty, specification-focused world of digital cameras, has proved incredibly successful – in the 2015/16 financial year, Instax cameras outsold Fujifilm’s own digital cameras almost four times over.
Professionals are taking note too: “I will often take an Instax Share on a job and print some images to give to a client there and then. They don’t replace full resolution prints, but it can be nice to get a print direct from the camera and hand it straight to the client”, said Mullins.
Slowly, this astonishing success is being recognised by competitors. German luxury camera maker Leica, whose flagship products easily clear the £5,000 mark, recently launched the Sofort – an instant camera only slightly more expensive than the Instax range, and squarely aimed at marketing the concept to a more serious, adult crowd.
As digital camera sales continue to slow and manufacturers struggle to excite consumers, the key players would do well to stop ignoring the rebirth of analogue media. The potential for growth is clear, and the opportunity to take film camera sales away from the second-hand market is staring camera makers in the face. It will take courage to invest in what many still see as a ‘dead’ medium, but the rewards are clear to see – an exciting, largely untapped market awaits.